Postiwyd: Gwe 21 Mai 2004 11:03 pmPostiwyd: Gwe 21 Mai 2004 11:24 pmPostiwyd: Gwe 21 Mai 2004 11:47 pmpogon_szczec a ddywedodd:Na, mae'n nhw'n waeth off oherwydd Comiwnyddion (h.y pobl wirion fel tithau a Sioni Spart) sy yn eu rheoli nhw.
Na'th Pol Pot (idol Chomsky) lofruddio miliynau mwy na'r Americanwyr.
Na'th yr Americanwyr ollwng dau fom atomig dros Siapan, ac un o wledydd cyfoethocaf y byb yn nhw erbyn heddiw.
Feddylia amdano (os gelli di).
Pogon a ddywedodd:Na, mae'n nhw'n waeth off oherwydd Comiwnyddion (h.y pobl wirion fel tithau a Sioni Spart)
Na'th yr Americanwyr ollwng dau fom atomig dros Siapan, ac un o wledydd cyfoethocaf y byb yn nhw erbyn heddiw.
Postiwyd: Gwe 21 Mai 2004 11:52 pm
Postiwyd: Sad 22 Mai 2004 12:18 amPostiwyd: Sad 22 Mai 2004 12:31 amDan Dean a ddywedodd:
Nid yw Pol Pot yn idol Chomsky y retard. Doro dystiolaeth o bod Chomsky yn addoli rhywyn fela, plis.
Chomsky suggested in an article in 1977 that post-war Cambodia was probably similar to France at the end of WW2 when enemy collaborators were massacred.
This, (in his opinion), was, "a small price to pay for the positive outcomes of the new government of Pol Pot".
Postiwyd: Sad 22 Mai 2004 1:09 ampogon_szczec a ddywedodd:Dan Dean a ddywedodd:
Nid yw Pol Pot yn idol Chomsky y retard. Doro dystiolaeth o bod Chomsky yn addoli rhywyn fela, plis.
Mae'r erthygl yn hir, ac mae'n cynnwys geiriau anodd.
Ond gallaf ddangos dyfyniad gan ddefnyddio'r ffont mwyaf:Chomsky suggested in an article in 1977 that post-war Cambodia was probably similar to France at the end of WW2 when enemy collaborators were massacred.
This, (in his opinion), was, "a small price to pay for the positive outcomes of the new government of Pol Pot".
http://www.newcriterion.com/archive/21/ ... homsky.htm
Back in June, Anthony Lewis wrote a NYT column about Pol Pot and Cambodia including the assertion: "A few Western intellectuals, notably Prof. Noam Chomsky, refused to believe what was going on in Cambodia. At first, at least, they put the reports of killing down to a conspiratorial effort by American politicians and press to destroy the Cambodian revolution." As is his style, Lewis's comment appeared with no supporting evidence despite the fact that: (1) There is much documentation that Chomsky endeavored to clarify the truth about events in Cambodia both as relates to Pol Pot's responsibility as well as the (oft-ignored) responsibility of the U.S. And, (2) Chomsky never made any allegations of a "conspiratorial effort by American politicians and press to destroy the Cambodian revolution," much less attributing all reports of terror to it.
Postiwyd: Sad 22 Mai 2004 1:12 amPostiwyd: Sad 22 Mai 2004 12:34 pmPostiwyd: Sad 22 Mai 2004 1:00 pmCwlcymro a ddywedodd:I drio troi hwn yn ol at y pwnc, sud fedr unrhywun gefnogi byddin sy'n lladd degau o bobl mewn parti blydi priodas!
