Atebion diddorol iawn yn fana rooney. echod nad ydy nhw'n cydfynd a cyfieithiad gweddill cristnogaeth o'r beibl
Q. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may buy slaves from the nations that are around us. A friend of mine claims that this applies to the French but not to the Scots. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Scottish people?
A. It doesn't actually say slaves, it says 'bondmen and bondmaids'
Bible Gateway a ddywedodd:44 " 'Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can will them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.
Hefyd mae'r atebion hyn....
Q.I have a neighbour who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obliged to kill him myself or may I arrange for our vicar to do it?
A. ...Report your neighbour to the police, support your allegation with two witnesses, and see if the police can find a law against what your neighbour is doing. They won't. This country doesn't do a day of rest in any form any more.
Q. My friend tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone him as commanded in Leviticus 24:10-16 ?
A. Yes, because it is all a matter of due process. You are a bit for taking the law into your own hands, aren't you? Does your friend actually curse the Name of God like the man in Leviticus did? Anyway, next you must find a judge and jury who will convict him. Unless
Q. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws (Leviticus 20:14)?
A. You don't half have a vicious streak. Once again, in God's design for mankind, the State has the responsibility for the judicial death penalty, not the family. God's law does not allow people to put members of their own family to death.
yn gwneud ein pwynt ni drosto ni, hynny yw nad yw rhai o foesoldebau'r beibl yn gwneud unrhyw synnwyr yn y byd modern. Felly pam fod Cristnogion yn mynny fod moesoldebau'r beibl yn holl-bwysig (gwrth-hoywon etc) tra ei bod nhwn barod i sgipio drost y rhan fwyaf?
Yw moesoldeb un person yr un mor ddilys a moesoldeb person arall?
Peth
subjective iawn ydi moesoldeb. Mi fyswn i yn dweud mae fy moesoldeb i yw'r un cywir, mi fysa chdi'n dweud mae dy un di ydio. Fel bron pob peth
subjective arall yn anffodus, gair y mwyafrif sy'n cael ei glywed. Ym Mhrydain mae moesoldeb y mwyafrif yn wahanol iawn i foesoldeb mwyafrif Saudia Arabia. Mi ydwi ddigon parod i roi fy marn ar ei moesoldeb nhw, ac ma nhwtha ddigon parod i roi ei barn ar fy moesoldeb inna. Dydi dy foesoldeb di ddim
gwell na fy moesoldeb i am ei fod o'n dod or beibl. Dyna holl ystyr
subjective, pawb ai'r farn fel petai.