Erthygl Daily Mail am sianel teledu Gaeleg

[Gwenci Ddrwg]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/a ... ge_id=1773

Dim ond tipyn bach o rhagfarn ynddi, dim ond tipyn bach. Ar ôl be welais i ar Fòram na Gàidhlig mae un neu dau siaradwr Gaeleg wedi ysgrifennu sylwadau i gwyno am y lefel ofnadwy o ragfarn yn erbyn y sianel ond mae'r bocs isod dal ddeud "nobody's posted a comment yet" neu rhywbeth (IE maen nhw wedi cael eu anwybyddu yn fwriadol, i ddangos i'r darllenwyr nad oes unrhyw diddordeb yn y gymuned leol). Dyma email newydd mae siaradwr Gaeleg yn mynd i roi iddynt wedi cael ei anwybyddu ar y wefan:

To: letters@dailymail.co.uk
Subject: Honesty and Dailymail.co.uk

While I am quite disappointed that the web team declined to publish a message I posted critical of the article "Fury as BBC agrees to spend £21million of taxpayers' money on Gaelic TV channel", I cannot say I am particularly surprised.

While I accept that it is at the editorial team's discretion whether to publish or not -- and this much was certainly made clear when I submitted my letter -- it is gross dishonesty to continue to carry the statement

"No comments have so far been submitted. Why not be the first to send us your thoughts? "

at the bottom of the article when it is patently untrue.

As a supporter of the Gaelic channel, it appears to me as though the web team are trying to support the biased view of the article by maintaining an apparent lack of interest in the topic by the public at large.

I will say again: this is grossly dishonest. It is also a grievous insult to a number of your readers.

I hope you can assure me that this will be corrected as soon as practically possible.

Dyma bwnc hollol ar fforwm Gaeleg os hoffech chi ddysgu mwy am be sy'n digwydd (digon o Saesneg i ddeall os dach chi ddim yn siarad Gaeleg ond sut bynnag mae 'na tipyn o negeseuon arni heb gyfiaith):

http://www.noclockthing.de/foramnagaidh ... .php?t=190

[Macsen]

FURY as Macsen reads the Daily Mail again.

The service will cost at least £139 per year for every user - an equivalent amount to the current annual licence fee of £135.50.

Felly bydd ffi leisans pob defnyddiwr yn cael ei wario ar rywbeth mae nhw'n ei wylio? Be nesa?

[Mihangel Macintosh]

Blydi hell Macsen, sdim pwynt trio rhesymu gyda ffasgwyr!

[Positif80]

Dw i'n hoff o'r dudalen cwestiwn ac ateb.

[S.W.]

Welodd rhywun sylwadau Gorgeous George Galloway ar y sianel? Oedd o'n afiach. Methu postio lincs fyny ar hyn o bryd ond mae Vaughan Rodderick yn son amdano ar ei flog ar wefan y BBC.

[Seonaidh/Sioni]

Ay. mae hynny'n uabhasach. Ond dim ond beth fydda'i'n disgwyl oddi wrth y Daily Nazi (Golygyddol yn ystod y 1930au - "Hurrah for Hitler!").

[Gwenci Ddrwg]

Golygyddol yn ystod y 1930au - "Hurrah for Hitler!"

Yn wir? Waw, ond dim synnu.

[Macsen]

Ond dim ond beth fydda'i'n disgwyl oddi wrth y Daily Nazi (Golygyddol yn ystod y 1930au - "Hurrah for Hitler!").

'Hurrah for the Blackshirts' odd hwnna.

I urge all British young men and women to study closely the progress of the Nazi regime in Germany. They must not be misled by the misrepresentations of its opponents. The most spiteful distracters of the Nazis are to be found in precisely the same sections of the British public and press as are most vehement in their praises of the Soviet regime in Russia. They have started a clamorous campaign of denunciation against what they call "Nazi atrocities" which, as anyone who visits Germany quickly discovers for himself, consists merely of a few isolated acts of violence such as are inevitable among a nation half as big again as ours, but which have been generalized, multiplied and exaggerated to give the impression that Nazi rule is a bloodthirsty tyranny.

[Gwenci Ddrwg]

Wps mae nhw di colli tipyn o hygrededd fan hyn. Dwi'n gobeithio nad oes gormod o bobl sy'n cymryd y bapur yn ddifrif.

[krustysnaks]

Mae'n bosib dyfynnu pethau tebyg gan y Daily Herald (papur y Blaid Lafur) neu'r Daily Mirror ynglŷn â'r Undeb Sofietaidd yn ystod yr un cyfnod ...